Industry body · Content Marketing Institute (with MarketingProfs)
B2B Content Marketing ROI 2026: 12% Hit Their Goals
The Content Marketing Institute's 2026 B2B Content Marketing Benchmarks finds that only 12% of B2B marketers rate their content as highly effective (the share who exceeded their goals), and 33% still cite measuring content effectiveness as a top challenge, a decade after the same survey series first surfaced the ROI tracking gap.
Source published Summarised
Read the full report from Content Marketing Institute (with MarketingProfs)
Key findings at a glance
- 1,015 B2B marketers qualified for the 2026 outlook from 1,229 global responses, fielded 24 June to 14 August 2025.
- 12% Rate their content marketing as highly effective, meaning they exceeded their goals over the prior 12 months.
- 47% Rate themselves somewhat effective, meaning they met most of their content marketing goals.
- 33% Cite measuring content effectiveness as a top three challenge, a decade after the original "21% successful at tracking ROI" finding.
- 39% Cite resource constraints (time, people, budget) as a top three challenge, the second most common blocker.
- 40% Cite creating content that prompts a desired action, e.g. conversion, as a top challenge, the single largest pain point.
- 97% Operate from a documented or undocumented content marketing strategy of some kind, up sharply from the 2015 baseline.
- 95% Use AI-powered marketing applications in some part of their content workflow.
- 45% Plan to increase 2026 investment in AI tools, the single largest budget priority across the survey.
- 9% Plan to grow human-resources investment in 2026, the lowest budget priority in the dataset.
What the report covers
The Content Marketing Institute (CMI), in partnership with MarketingProfs and sponsored by Storyblok, has run its annual B2B Content Marketing Benchmarks, Budgets, and Trends survey since 2010. The 2026 outlook draws on 1,015 qualified B2B marketer responses from 1,229 global submissions, fielded between 24 June and 14 August 2025. Respondents come from across in-house, agency and consultancy roles, weighted to North America.
This is the same survey series that produced the often-cited "only 21% of B2B marketers say their organizations are successful at tracking content marketing ROI" line from the 2015 outlook. The 2026 question set is broader: rather than a single ROI-tracking question, marketers self-rate effectiveness across a five-point scale (highly effective through highly ineffective) and pick from a top-challenges list. The headline measurement-related figures are 12% highly effective, 47% somewhat effective, and 33% who name measuring content effectiveness as one of their top three challenges. Resource constraints (39%) and creating content that prompts a desired action (40%) are the other two top blockers.
The decade-long lens matters. The 2015 outlook landed when most B2B marketers were still operationalising content strategy. The 2026 outlook lands with 97% claiming a content marketing strategy of some kind, 95% using AI in part of their workflow, and AI tooling (45%) the single largest 2026 budget priority. Measurement, despite all of that, has not moved off the top-three challenges list.
What this means for UK marketers
For UK B2B marketers, three concrete reads come out of the 2026 measurement data.
First, the "successful at tracking ROI" framing has aged out. Modern measurement is now reported as a multi-axis effectiveness self-rating, and the meaningful benchmark to compare against is the 12% "highly effective" (exceeded goals) band, not a single binary ROI question. If your content programme cannot honestly self-rate "exceeded goals" against pre-stated KPIs, you are not in that 12% even if a dashboard claims otherwise. The exercise to run quarterly is mundane: write down the two or three numerical goals you set at the start of the period, then mark them green, amber or red against actuals. Marketers who do not do this are guessing.
Second, the 33% who still cite measurement as a top challenge are doing so in a world where 95% of B2B marketers have AI applications in workflow. AI did not solve measurement. It scaled output. UK marketers piloting AI content tooling should bake measurement design into the pilot brief, not bolt it on afterwards, otherwise volume goes up while the ability to prove what worked stays flat. This is the precondition for the kind of SEO programme that compounds attribution over 12 to 24 months.
Third, the 9% budget priority on human resources (the lowest of any line in the 2026 outlook) is the structural risk flag for measurement maturity. Measurement is largely a craft skill: setting goals, instrumenting analytics, joining marketing data to CRM revenue, presenting findings to a finance audience. Cutting investment in the people who do that work while increasing investment in AI tools that generate raw output is the textbook setup for the brand "doom loop" Gartner flagged in its late-2025 survey of senior marketing leaders, where underfunded measurement leads to unclear impact, which leads to tighter budgets, which leads to less measurement investment. For UK B2B operators, the corrective is unglamorous: pay an analyst, write a measurement plan, agree it with finance before campaigns go live. That is the work that turns content output into the kind of credibly attributed pipeline our digital marketing services for UK B2B brands are designed to produce.
The wider implication for any marketer still recycling 2015-era stats in client decks: the "21% successful at tracking ROI" line is no longer the benchmark. The 2026 figure to anchor on is "12% exceeded goals". It is harder, more direct, and more useful for setting a realistic improvement target. For background on how marketing return on investment is conceptualised across disciplines, the Wikipedia entry on return on marketing investment is a sober summary. Our companion 2026 CMI benchmarks report covers the effectiveness, AI adoption and budget angles of the same dataset.
How they got the data
The Content Marketing Institute fielded the 16th annual B2B Content Marketing Benchmarks, Budgets, and Trends survey from 24 June to 14 August 2025, in partnership with MarketingProfs and sponsored by Storyblok. CMI received 1,229 global responses and qualified 1,015 for analysis. Respondents skew North America with smaller representation from EMEA, APAC and LATAM. The data covers in-house marketers, agency staff and independent consultants serving B2B clients across small, mid-market and enterprise organisations. Findings on effectiveness, strategy adoption, AI usage, thought leadership maturity, and budget priorities are reported as straight percentages of qualified respondents.
The "highly effective" band is defined as marketers who report having exceeded their content marketing goals in the prior 12 months. "Somewhat effective" means they met most goals. The top-challenges question is multi-select; respondents pick their top three, and CMI reports each challenge as the percentage of all qualified respondents who selected it.
Industry body
Read the full report
From Content Marketing Institute (with MarketingProfs) · published 08/10/2025