Industry body · Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
BCG: CEO growth talk up 12% globally, 24% in Europe
After two years on the defensive, CEOs are pivoting back to growth, Q4 2025 earnings-call mentions of top-line growth rose 12% globally, with European companies leaning in twice as hard. BCG's playbook for capturing the moment turns on bold targets, AI as a cost-of-innovation lever, and an always-on M&A capability.
Source published Summarised
Key findings at a glance
- 12% Global rise in mentions of top-line growth on Q4 2025 earnings calls versus Q4 2024. CEOs are visibly pivoting back to ambition after two defensive years.
- 24% The same earnings-call rise among European-headquartered companies, double the global rate. Europe is leaning into growth harder than any other region.
- 3.5x More patents produced by AI leaders than by companies that have not yet scaled the technology. The innovation gap between haves and have-nots is widening fast.
- $2tn Undeployed capital sitting with private equity firms as of October 2025. Corporate buyers face a more crowded M&A market through 2026.
- $10bn+ Threshold defining a 'megadeal', 2025 saw more megadeals than 2024, ending nearly two years of M&A stagnation across sectors.
What the report covers
The Guide is part of BCG's annual CEO Agenda series, authored by partners from BCG's Cost, M&A, Global Advantage and Transform practices, Jessica Apotheker, Aparna Bharadwaj, Paul Goydan, Daniel Friedman, Jens Kengelbach and Tuukka Seppä. It draws on a proprietary earnings-call mention dataset, BCG's AI Radar research, and the firm's M&A and PMI benchmarks. The geographic lens is global, with a specific European pull-out on the growth-mention rise.
The framing is deliberately countercyclical. After three years of cost-out, supply-chain triage and trade-policy whiplash, BCG argues that the CEOs poised to win in 2026 are the ones moving on growth while peers remain in defensive mode. The reasoning isn't that conditions are clear, geopolitical tension, capital constraints and slowing global GDP all remain, but that buyers willing to commit during disruption capture disproportionate share when the cycle turns. The growth-mention data point is BCG's headline evidence that the corner-office pivot is already under way.
Four operating moves form the spine of the guide: set a bold target with a clear inorganic-versus-organic growth equation; run growth programmatically with a dedicated transformation officer and a live dashboard; use AI to compress the cost of innovation and improve speed to market; and build an 'always-on' M&A capability rather than waiting for episodic deal sprints. A closing thought ties it back to cost discipline, growth and resilience aren't opposing strategies, and savings reinvested in AI fuel a virtuous cycle. This complements BCG's earlier finding on board-level AI pressure, which surfaced the demand-side urgency that this guide is now matching with a supply-side playbook.
What this means for UK marketers
Four practical reads for UK agencies and in-house marketing teams.
Marketing budgets sit on a knife edge inside the 'growth plus cost discipline' play. BCG explicitly frames cost-out as the fuel for growth investment, and historically that framing produces two outcomes for marketing: either it gets ring-fenced as a growth lever (ad spend, demand gen and brand investment all expand) or it gets treated as a cost line to compress. The deciding factor is whether marketing leaders can show a defensible growth-attribution model. UK marketers heading into 2026 budget rounds should be packaging proposals around incremental revenue contribution, not media efficiency. CPL and CAC arguments lose to 'how much top-line did this generate' arguments every time in a growth-pivot year.
Europe is leaning in twice as hard, which means the UK pipeline gets noisier first. A 24% rise in growth-mention frequency at European companies, versus 12% globally, translates directly into more competition for share-of-voice on UK SERPs and in paid social auctions through 2026. Google Ads CPCs in growth-aligned categories are likely to climb earlier than US peers, particularly in the B2B SaaS, fintech and professional-services brackets where European CEOs are most exposed. Build the auction-cost rise into 2026 forecasts now rather than discovering it in Q2.
AI as a cost-of-innovation lever applies directly to content and creative. The 3.5x patent output advantage for AI-scaled companies is a corporate-R&D finding, but the same logic powers a marketing application: AI-enabled creative production, programmatic SEO output, and personalisation at scale all sit inside the same 'lower cost of failure' thesis. UK agencies that have already wired AI into the creative and content pipeline will be the ones credible enough to win 2026 retainers. Those still treating AI as a productivity hack rather than an operating-model rebuild will price out. The trajectory of enterprise AI spend reinforces that the gap is widening, not stabilising.
The M&A wave creates a buyer-side opportunity for agencies. With $2 trillion in private-equity dry powder and corporate buyers building always-on radars, the M&A integration economy expands. UK digital marketing and web design agencies that can demonstrate a clean post-merger integration playbook, domain consolidation, brand migration, marketing-tech rationalisation, will see RFPs they would not otherwise see. Every acquired entity arrives with a marketing stack that needs rationalising; that work is there for any agency positioned to bid for it.
How they got the data
The Guide draws on BCG's proprietary analysis of public-company earnings-call transcripts, specifically Q4 2024 versus Q4 2025, to track shifts in CEO language around top-line growth and innovation. That dataset is supplemented by BCG's AI Radar research on the operational impact of scaled AI deployment (the source of the 3.5x patent output finding) and by the firm's M&A practice benchmarks on private-equity dry powder, megadeal frequency and post-merger integration performance.
Where the Guide cites investor priorities and growth-target benchmarks, the underlying data is BCG's CEO Pulse, a recurring survey of senior corporate-development and finance executives, though the publication does not disclose sample sizes or fieldwork dates within the public summary. The 'growth equation' and 'programmatic growth' frameworks themselves are BCG's own analytical models drawn from the firm's Transform practice rather than third-party empirical findings.
Industry body
Read the full report
From Boston Consulting Group (BCG) · published 18/03/2026