Research institute · Edelman Trust Institute
76% of Britons Distrust Outsiders, 2026 Trust Barometer Finds
The 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer finds that trust is consolidating into smaller, closed circles rather than broad public institutions or debate. Seventy percent of people globally, and 76% in the UK, are now hesitant or unwilling to trust someone who holds different values, social views, background or information sources to their own. Edelman calls this a slide "from grievance into insularity" - the same dynamic that is quietly pushing brand-relevant conversation out of public feeds and into DMs, group chats and closed communities.
Source published Summarised
Key findings at a glance
- 70% Share of people globally who are hesitant or unwilling to trust someone with different values, social-issue views, background or information sources than their own - the core insularity measure in the 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer.
- 76% UK share saying the same, above the 70% global average and higher than the US (70%) and Canada (73%), though below Japan (90%) and Germany (81%).
- ~34,000 Respondents surveyed across 28 countries for the 2026 Trust Barometer, fielded 25 October to 16 November 2025 via 30-minute online interviews, with a global margin of error of +/-0.7 percentage points.
- 62% Of people who trust a food or lifestyle influencer say they would reconsider a company they currently distrust if that influencer vouched for it - peer and influencer vouching can override existing brand distrust.
- 57% Of people who trust a financial influencer say the same about reconsidering a distrusted company, showing the vouching effect holds outside lifestyle categories too.
What the report covers
The 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer is the latest edition of Edelman's annual global trust study, published around 21 January 2026 by the Edelman Trust Institute. The survey polled roughly 34,000 respondents across 28 countries, with 30-minute online interviews fielded between 25 October and 16 November 2025. The global margin of error is +/-0.7 percentage points, rising to +/-3.3 to 3.7 percentage points per country.
Edelman's headline framing this year is that society is sliding "from grievance into insularity". Where prior editions tracked declining trust in government, media and business as an outward-facing grievance, the 2026 data shows people responding by narrowing who they trust at all. Seventy percent globally, and 76% in the UK, say they are hesitant or unwilling to trust someone who does not share their values, social-issue views, background or information sources. Japan (90%) and Germany (81%) sit above the UK; the US (70%) sits on the global average.
The same report finds that vouching from a trusted influencer can move people past an existing brand distrust: 62% of people who trust a food or lifestyle influencer, and 57% of those who trust a financial influencer, say they would reconsider a company they currently distrust if that influencer backed it. Trust is not disappearing, it is relocating - away from institutions and public discourse and into smaller circles of people whose judgement is already trusted.
What this means for UK marketers
This is the mechanism behind what looks, from the outside, like a shift in platform behaviour. Marketers have watched public engagement metrics soften for two or three years and mostly explained it with algorithm changes or feed fatigue. Edelman's insularity data suggests something more structural is going on underneath the platforms: people are not disengaging from conversation, they are relocating it into rooms where everyone already agrees with them. A DM thread, a group chat or a closed community is, functionally, a trust perimeter. Once 70 to 76% of people are unwilling to extend trust outside a values-aligned circle, the conversations that actually move purchase decisions move with them.
For attribution, this is uncomfortable but not new. Dark social traffic (shares and links passed through messaging apps, private groups and email rather than trackable public shares) has always undercounted its own influence, because most analytics tools log it as direct or unattributed traffic. What the trust data adds is a reason the volume moving through dark channels keeps growing rather than levelling off. If trust in outsiders keeps falling, the public feed stops being where recommendations happen and becomes, at best, a discovery layer that gets validated privately before anyone acts on it.
The influencer-vouching numbers point to the practical lever. Sixty-two percent of people who trust a food or lifestyle influencer, and 57% who trust a financial one, say that trust can override an existing distrust of the brand itself. That is a workaround for opacity, not a solution to it: brands cannot see most of the private conversation, but they can still earn a place in it by investing in the smaller number of people whose recommendation actually counts inside those closed circles - genuine category experts and community moderators, not just reach-driven creators.
The brands adapting well treat newsletters, owned communities and micro-influencer relationships as primary channels rather than top-of-funnel afterthoughts, because those are the closest thing to a trust perimeter a brand can build itself. The mistake we see most often is the opposite: a brand parachutes into an existing private community (a subreddit, a Discord server, a Facebook group) with an obvious sales pitch and burns the one asset those spaces run on. Insularity cuts both ways - once a brand is marked as an outsider in a closed group, Edelman's own data says that judgement is now harder than ever to reverse.
How they got the data
The 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer surveyed approximately 34,000 respondents across 28 countries, with 30-minute online interviews conducted between 25 October and 16 November 2025 by the Edelman Trust Institute. The global margin of error is +/-0.7 percentage points; individual country margins of error range from +/-3.3 to 3.7 percentage points. The study has run annually since 2001 and is one of the most widely cited cross-market trust benchmarks used by communicators, marketers and policymakers.
Research institute
Read the full report
From Edelman Trust Institute · published 21/01/2026